AUTO-UPDATED

I ran Nvidia's NemoClaw to see if OpenClaw is finally safe, but it still has the same problems

Nvidia’s new NemoClaw security stack attempts to mitigate risks in the popular OpenClaw AI platform, but early testing reveals significant usability bugs and persistent architectural security vulnerabilities.

Key Points

  • NemoClaw provides a sandbox environment with deny-by-default network policies and kernel-level filesystem isolation to contain OpenClaw agents.
  • Users report frequent technical issues, including permission errors, dashboard connectivity failures, and complex setup requirements for local inference backends like Ollama.
  • The platform fails to address semantic-level threats, such as prompt injection, which can bypass sandboxing by manipulating agents through trusted service integrations.
  • Despite the security layer, the underlying architecture of OpenClaw remains flawed because it merges control and data planes, leaving users vulnerable to credential theft.
  • The software is currently in an early preview stage, with many features requiring manual workarounds to function as intended.

Why it Matters

While NemoClaw offers a necessary improvement over running AI agents on bare systems, it does not solve the fundamental trust issues inherent in giving autonomous models access to personal data. Users must recognize that sandboxing cannot prevent malicious instructions from exploiting legitimate service connections, meaning the platform is not yet ready for secure, reliable daily use.
XDA Developers Published by Adam Conway
Read original